From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 28, 2001
805 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-4622

Opinion filed December 28, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge.


James Earl Battle appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to Battle's right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion, if he is able to do so. See Hall v. State, 784 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (stating that a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) claim for additional jail time credit for time spent at a drug treatment center must allege that the drug treatment center was the functional equivalent of jail).

Affirmed.

COVINGTON, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.


Summaries of

Battle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 28, 2001
805 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Battle v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EARL BATTLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 28, 2001

Citations

805 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Phillips v. State

We affirm. The appellant failed to allege that the "Family Service" program was the "functional equivalent of…