Opinion
June 20, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.).
The first decretal paragraph is modified, without opposition, to conform to the requirements of the statute.
General testimony by the wife as to the disabilities she suffers as a result of her age and medical condition was properly admitted since the effect of these conditions on the wife's ability to work is readily apparent without the necessity of expert testimony (see, Monahan v Weichert, 82 A.D.2d 102).
We have considered all of the plaintiff's remaining arguments on appeal, and find them to be without merit. (Leider v Otero-Leider, 161 A.D.2d 277.) Nor is there any basis to interfere with the trial court's findings forming the basis for its awards.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.