From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battaglia v. Sisters of Charity Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1986
124 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

November 10, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Broughton, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's first cause of action. The personnel manual in this case cannot be interpreted to limit defendant's power to terminate an at-will employee in light of the language of the manual that it is not a contract, that it may be modified, amended or supplemented, and that the hospital retains the right to make all necessary management decisions for the delivery of patient care services and the selection, direction, compensation and retention of employees (see, Collins v Hoselton Datsun, 120 A.D.2d 952; cf. Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 458; Tiranno v Sears, Roebuck Co., 99 A.D.2d 675).


Summaries of

Battaglia v. Sisters of Charity Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1986
124 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Battaglia v. Sisters of Charity Hospital

Case Details

Full title:KATHRYN BATTAGLIA, Respondent, v. SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Stanton v. Highland Hospital of Rochester

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.…

Nicolo v. Citibank

In the court's opinion, the language contained in the booklet is not susceptible to being interpreted as…