From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Batiste v. Stryker Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 7, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-574-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. May. 7, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-574-JWD-EWD

05-07-2020

DINA BATISTE v. STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 20) dated April 22, 2020, to which no objection was filed,

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, (Doc. 7), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stryker's request for jurisdictional discovery and Plaintiff's request for costs and fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) are DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a scheduling conference.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on May 7, 2020.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Batiste v. Stryker Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 7, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-574-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. May. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Batiste v. Stryker Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DINA BATISTE v. STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 7, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-574-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. May. 7, 2020)

Citing Cases

Vinterella v. Lumpuy

While a jury trial demand by Plaintiff would not be dispositive of the amount in controversy, it would be…

Matthews v. Allen

While a jury trial demand by Plaintiffs would not be dispositive of the amount in controversy, it would be…