From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. United Parcel Serv

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 24, 2007
485 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 04-17295.

April 24, 2007.

Caroline A. Jacobs, Esq., Oakland, CA, Guy B. Wallace, Esq., Todd M. Schneider, Schneider Wallace, San Francisco, CA, Laurence W. Paradis, Esq., Disability Rights Advocates, Berkeley, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Mark A. Perry, Esq., Christopher J. Martin, Esq., Susan B. Burr, Esq., Rachel A. Clark, Esq, Gibson Dunn Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Prior report: 465 F.3d 1069 (2006)


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Wardlaw is recused.


Summaries of

Bates v. United Parcel Serv

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 24, 2007
485 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Bates v. United Parcel Serv

Case Details

Full title:Eric BATES; Bert Enos; Babaranti Oloyede; Eric Bumbala; Edward Williams…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 2007

Citations

485 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Bach v. Cmty. Ties of Am., Inc.

Additionally, on the burden of proof, "the plaintiff also bears the burden of establishing that he can…