From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bastian Bros. Co. v. McGowan

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jul 11, 1940
113 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1940)

Opinion

No. 376.

July 11, 1940.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.

Action by the Bastian Brothers Company against George T. McGowan, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Twenty-Eighth Collection District of New York, to recover sums paid as surtaxes on undistributed profits. From a judgment dismissing the complaint as stating no cause of action, 32 F. Supp. 93, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Remington Remington, of Rochester, N.Y. (Albert S. Willey, of Rochester, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Arthur L. Jacobs, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and George L. Grobe, U.S. Atty., and Joseph J. Doran, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Buffalo, N Y, for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.


By this action the plaintiff seeks to recover sums paid as surtaxes on undistributed profits for the years 1936 and 1937. Its complaint was dismissed as stating no cause of action. The question presented is whether a corporation whose capital has been so impaired by operating losses in prior years that in the tax years in question it is forbidden by the statutes of the state of its incorporation to declare a dividend, is entitled to a credit under section 26(c)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 49 Stat. 1648, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev. Acts, page 836, in the calculation of taxes on undistributed profits. More precisely the issue is whether the New York statutes forbidding the declaration or payment of dividends while capital is impaired may be deemed to fall within the language of said section 26(c)(1) as "a provision of a written contract executed by the corporation prior to May 1, 1936, which provision expressly deals with the payment of dividends." Both the text and the legislative history of the section support the decision of the district judge and we are content to affirm the judgment upon his opinion. See D.C., 32 F. Supp. 93. He followed Crane-Johnson Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 105 F.2d 740, certiorari granted 309 U.S. 692, 60 S.Ct. 708, 84 L.Ed. ___. Subsequently the ninth circuit decided by a divided court in favor of the taxpayer. Northwest Rolling Mills, Inc., v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 286. We agree with the former decision.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Bastian Bros. Co. v. McGowan

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jul 11, 1940
113 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1940)
Case details for

Bastian Bros. Co. v. McGowan

Case Details

Full title:BASTIAN BROS. CO. v. McGOWAN, Collector of Internal Revenue

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jul 11, 1940

Citations

113 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1940)