Opinion
May 1, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).
The parties' unique shared custody arrangement warranted the IAS Court's resort to the paragraph (f) factors for calculating child support under the Child Support Standards Act (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1-b][f]) in preference to the percentage formula of paragraph (c) ( see, Matter of Cassano v. Cassano, 85 N.Y.2d 649, 653, 655). Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was properly denied for failure to demonstrate either that the award was excessive or that there was a substantial change in circumstances from the time of the hearing to the release of the court's decision (Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][9][b]; cf., Matter of King v. King, 193 A.D.2d 800).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ. [ See, 167 Misc.2d 749.]