From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Basra v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 3, 2018
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06005-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06005-RBL-JRC

01-03-2018

PARAMJIT SINGH BASRA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD MORGAN, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 39) is granted in part and denied in part, as follows:

(1) RLUIPA and the First Amendment:

a. The restriction on regular contact visitation with plaintiff's daughter is the least restrictive means of furthering safety and security and summary judgment is granted as to this claim brought pursuant to RLUIPA, the Court denies
defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the claim regarding the restriction on all means of communication with her brought pursuant to RLUIPA.

b. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's claim that prohibiting plaintiff in person visitation violates the First Amendment is granted on the basis of qualified immunity.

c. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that the dietary restrictions violate RLUIPA is denied.

d. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that the dietary restrictions violate the First Amendment is denied.

(2) Retaliation: Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's claim that defendants retaliated against him is granted.

(3) Due Process: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiff's allegations that his due process rights have been violated by being denied visitation with his daughter and by defendants' failure to allow contact when a court has recalled a no contact order.

(4) Equal Protection: Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's claim of denial of Equal Protection in that he is being discriminated against on the basis of his religion is granted as to the restriction against contact visitation, but is denied as to the requirement that plaintiff make Commissary purchases if he wishes to follow his religious diet requiring dairy but including no meat.

(5) Personal participation insufficiently alleged:

a. The Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment as to all claims against defendants Morgan, Herzog, Wall, and Allison.
b. The Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment as to all claims against defendant Howell.

DATED this 3rd day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

Ronald B. Leighton

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Basra v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 3, 2018
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06005-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Basra v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:PARAMJIT SINGH BASRA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD MORGAN, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06005-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2018)