From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Rowell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan
Jun 29, 1905
64 A. 1135 (N.H. 1905)

Opinion

Decided June 29, 1905.

ASSUMPSIT. Trial by jury, verdict for the plaintiff, and motion for a new trial. Transferred from the November term, 1904, of the superior court by Peaslee, J.

Jesse M. Barton, for the plaintiff.

Albert S. Wait, for the defendant.


"A new trial may be granted in any case, when through accident, mistake, or misfortune justice has not been done and a further hearing would be equitable." P.S., c. 230, s. 1. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a petition in the superior court under this statute, alleging that new evidence had been discovered which upon another trial would change the result. Upon this petition the defendant introduced evidence tending to prove his position, but the court dismissed the petition, and the defendant excepted. The ground for dismissing the petition is not stated, and no question of law is necessarily raised by the exception. The order of the court does not appear to be erroneous.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.


Summaries of

Barton v. Rowell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan
Jun 29, 1905
64 A. 1135 (N.H. 1905)
Case details for

Barton v. Rowell

Case Details

Full title:BARTON, Trustee, v. ROWELL

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan

Date published: Jun 29, 1905

Citations

64 A. 1135 (N.H. 1905)
64 A. 1135

Citing Cases

Somerville v. Anderson

Unless expressly authorized by the terms of the trust, the trustee has no power to carry on a business, and…