From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartley v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 10, 2021
860 S.E.2d 918 (N.C. 2021)

Opinion

No. 359A20

08-10-2021

Bruce Allen BARTLEY v. CITY OF HIGH POINT and Matt Blackman, in his Official Capacity as a Police Officer with the City of High Point, and Individually

David L. Woodard, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Blackman, Matt. Brett A. Carpenter, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Blackman, Matt. Seth R. Cohen, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Bartley, Bruce Allen.


David L. Woodard, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Blackman, Matt.

Brett A. Carpenter, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Blackman, Matt.

Seth R. Cohen, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Bartley, Bruce Allen.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 11th of August 2020 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of August 2021."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.


Summaries of

Bartley v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 10, 2021
860 S.E.2d 918 (N.C. 2021)
Case details for

Bartley v. City of High Point

Case Details

Full title:Bruce Allen BARTLEY v. CITY OF HIGH POINT and Matt Blackman, in his…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Aug 10, 2021

Citations

860 S.E.2d 918 (N.C. 2021)