From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartley v. Accu-Glo Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2000
272 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued March 23, 2000.

May 8, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated May 17, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240 Lab.(1).

Michael F.X. Manning, Garden City, N.Y. (John P. Humphreys of counsel), for appellants.

David P. Kownacki, New York, N.Y., for respondents.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and upon searching the record, summary judgment is granted to the defendants dismissing the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).

While the injured plaintiff was standing on level ground, unloading a wire reel from the bed of a panel truck three feet from the ground, the reel caught on a lip of the bed of the truck and flew out, striking him. The instant action does not come within the scope of hazards covered by Labor Law § 240 (1) (see, Jacome v. State of New York, 266 A.D.2d 345 [2d Dept., Nov. 15, 1999]; cf., Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509). Although the defendants never cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' Labor Law § 240(1) claim, this court has the authority pursuant to CPLR 3212(b) to search the record and award summary judgment to a nonmoving party (see, QDR Consultants Dev. Corp. v. Colonia Ins. Co., 251 A.D.2d 641; Dunham v. Hilco, 89 N.Y.2d 430).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bartley v. Accu-Glo Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2000
272 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Bartley v. Accu-Glo Electric Corp.

Case Details

Full title:William Bartley, et al., respondents, v. Accu-Glo Electric Corporation, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 127

Citing Cases

Kobetitsch v. P.M. Maintenance

We agree with the appellant that the plaintiffs were not entitled to summary judgment on their cause of…

In Matter of the Estate of Mannion

Respondent Kathleen Falciano does not cross-move for an order granting summary judgment on behalf of the…