Opinion
Rehearing Denied May 29, 1937.
Hearing Granted by Supreme Court June 28, 1937.
Appeal from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Clement L. Shinn, Judge.
COUNSEL
A. W. Sorenson, B. A. Finch, G. C. DeGarmo, and W. M. Crane, all of Los Angeles, for plaintiffs, appellants and respondents.
Swanwick, Donnelly & Proudfit and Finlayson, Bennett & Morrow, all of Los Angeles, for plaintiffs, appellants and respondents California Trust Co.
Chapman & Chapman, Joseph K. Horton, and John S. Frazer, all of Los Angeles, for plaintiffs, appellants and respondents Bayly Bros., Harold Bayly, Roy D. Bayly, Suburban Estates, Inc., and Edwards & Wildey Co.
OPINION
BISHOP, Justice pro tem.
The opinion in the case of Mary Pickford Company v. Bayly Brothers, Inc., 68 P.2d 239, this day filed by us, contains our reasons for the judgments we are entering in the above-entitled cases. These and the Mary Pickford Company Case were all tried together and were presented to us on one reporter’s transcript. There is no difference, affecting the result, between the findings of fact in the case already disposed of and the findings in these cases. Judgments were rendered against the same defendants in these cases as in the other, and each appealed. The defendants Harold and Roy D. Bayly also appealed from the order in each case denying their motions to vacate the judgment and enter one favorable to them. No such motion was made by the respective plaintiffs, who have appealed from the judgment in that it denies them all the interest they sought.
The judgment in each case, above entitled, in so far as it affects the California Trust Company is reversed; otherwise it is affirmed. The order appealed from in each case is affirmed.
We concur: HOUSER, P. J.; DORAN, J.