From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barry v. Carnival

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 4, 2007
257 F. App'x 224 (11th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 06-12615, 06-13006.

December 4, 2007.

Michael Duke Eriksen, The Eriksen Law Firm, West Palm Bch., FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Rachel S. Cohen, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 05-22551-CV-KMM.

Before DUBINA and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and COOGLER, District Judge.

Honorable L. Scott Coogler, United Slates District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.


This appeal is from a district court's grant of a motion to dismiss based on standing, in an action brought for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and for injunctive relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 57. The plaintiffs, Kathryn Barry and Thomas Leslie, sought a declaration from the district court that defendant Carnival Corporation's ("Carnival") forum selection clause, which is on all of Carnival's ticket contracts is invalid.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties' briefs and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court's judgment of dismissal based on issue preclusion. See Christo v. Padgett, 223 F.3d 1324, 1339-10 (11th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Barry v. Carnival

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 4, 2007
257 F. App'x 224 (11th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Barry v. Carnival

Case Details

Full title:Kathryn BARRY, Thomas W. Leslie, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CARNIVAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Dec 4, 2007

Citations

257 F. App'x 224 (11th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Hardy v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

With respect to Hardy's claim for relief under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, "a plaintiff must prove…