From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrs v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Mar 1, 2023
386 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1D22-2944

03-01-2023

Justin Beau BARRS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Justin Beau Barrs, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

Justin Beau Barrs, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the motion for jail time credit, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus as moot where trial court had ruled on pending pleading).

Roberts, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barrs v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Mar 1, 2023
386 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Barrs v. State

Case Details

Full title:Justin Beau Barrs, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Mar 1, 2023

Citations

386 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)