From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrows v. Schofer

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 16, 2024
2:24-cv-00598-RSM (W.D. Wash. Jul. 16, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00598-RSM

07-16-2024

JENNIFER LYNN BARROWS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SCHOFER, et al., Defendants.

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants GOLDSTEIN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS JOSHUA L. GOLDSTEIN, WSBA# 61773 Attorney for Plaintiff


TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants

GOLDSTEIN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS

JOSHUA L. GOLDSTEIN, WSBA# 61773 Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and move to stay these proceedings through August 23, 2024. Plaintiff brings this litigation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel Defendants to complete processing of Plaintiff's husband's immigrant visa application. Defendants' response to the Complaint is currently due on July 9, 2024. For good cause, the parties request that the Court hold this case in abeyance through August 23, 2024.

Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 1.

The U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, has returned Plaintiff's Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative, to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) with a recommendation that the petition be revoked. USCIS previously approved the petition in 2021 and that is the underlying basis for the immigrant visa application at issue here. The return of the petition is in process. However, Defendants cannot act on the visa application as the petition is now back with USCIS. The parties need time to confer and to determine next steps for this litigation.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the instant action be stayed until August 23, 2024. The parties will submit a joint status report on or before August 23, 2024.

I certify that this memorandum contains 283 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

ORDER

The case is held in abeyance until August 23, 2024. The parties shall submit a joint status report on or before August 23, 2024. It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barrows v. Schofer

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 16, 2024
2:24-cv-00598-RSM (W.D. Wash. Jul. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Barrows v. Schofer

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER LYNN BARROWS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SCHOFER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 16, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00598-RSM (W.D. Wash. Jul. 16, 2024)