From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barron v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 1, 1925
270 S.W. 1021 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. 8802.

Delivered April 1, 1925.

Manufacturing Intoxicating Liquor — Evidence Held Sufficient.

No bills of exceptions appearing in the record, and the facts being sufficient to sustain the judgment the cause is affirmed.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Tried below before the Hon. C. A. Pippin, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

No brief filed for appellant.

Tom Garrard, State's Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.


Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas county of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a single bill of exceptions. The State's evidence sufficiently shows the commission of the offense. Appellant defended on the proposition of an alibi. This defense was submitted to the jury and by them solved adversely to the contention of the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Barron v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 1, 1925
270 S.W. 1021 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Barron v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAZ BARRON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 1, 1925

Citations

270 S.W. 1021 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
99 Tex. Crim. 551

Citing Cases

Vanwright v. State

In construing this portion of the prior statute (Art. 847 C.C.P., 1925) it has been repeatedly held that this…

McDonald v. State

We think this testimony was admissible. Houston and appellant were together and in possession of the stolen…