From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1940
10 S.E.2d 658 (N.C. 1940)

Opinion

(Filed 18 September, 1940.)

APPEAL by defendants from Burney, J., at June Term, 1940, of PASQUOTANK.

McMullan McMullan for plaintiff, appellee.

M. B. Simpson and John H. Hall for defendants, appellants.


Civil action in ejectment and for redemption and accounting.

From verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.


This is the same case that was before us on defendants' appeal at the Spring Term, 1939, reported in 215 N.C. 131, 1 S.E.2d 366, and again on plaintiff's appeal at the Spring Term, 1940, reported in 217 N.C. 175, 7 S.E.2d 383, new trials having been granted on the two former appeals, and is now before us on plaintiff's second appeal.

A careful perusal of the record engenders the conclusion that the controverted matters have been tried in substantial conformity to the opinions heretofore rendered in the case. No sufficient reason has been advanced for disturbing the result appearing on the present record.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1940
10 S.E.2d 658 (N.C. 1940)
Case details for

Barrett v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:MARIE BARRETT v. JOHN T. WILLIAMS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1940

Citations

10 S.E.2d 658 (N.C. 1940)
10 S.E.2d 658