From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Kasco Construction Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided June 8, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ANGELO D. RONCALLO, J.

Andrew M. Harrison and Morris J. Eisen for appellants.

Leo Rothbard for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion by deeming defendant's answer amended to include the affirmative defense of res judicata on a motion for summary judgment. Furthermore, although the prior judgment of Supreme Court does not specifically recite that it is "on the merits", that judgment should be given res judicata effect in order to prevent the plaintiff from circumventing the preclusion decree (cf. Palmer v Fox, 28 A.D.2d 968, affd 22 N.Y.2d 667).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Kasco Construction Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Barrett v. Kasco Construction Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE BARRETT, as Administrator of the Estate of CAMILLE BARRETT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 1982

Citations

56 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1982)
452 N.Y.S.2d 566
438 N.E.2d 99

Citing Cases

Holley v. Mandate Realty Corp.

The dissent's reliance upon Strange v. Montefiore Hosp. Med. Center ( 59 N.Y.2d 737, affg 91 A.D.2d 507) and…

GMAC Mortg. v. Coombs

Unlike a waiver of the jurisdictional defenses listed in CPLR 3211(a)(8) and (9), which cannot be retracted…