From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barracato v. Camp Bauman Buses, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 1995
217 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 31, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The sole contention raised by the plaintiff is that the court committed reversible error by allowing hearsay testimony by one of the defendants' witnesses. This issue is, in part, unpreserved for review. In any event, any error in the admission of hearsay testimony was harmless as we are satisfied that the result would have been the same if the evidence had not been improperly admitted (see, CPLR 2002; Willinger v. City of New Rochelle, 212 A.D.2d 526; Grawer Bear Constr. Corp. v. Bellino Constr. Co., 195 A.D.2d 499). Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barracato v. Camp Bauman Buses, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 1995
217 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Barracato v. Camp Bauman Buses, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE BARRACATO, Appellant, v. CAMP BAUMAN BUSES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 261

Citing Cases

Treminio v. Argueta

Any error in preventing the defendant from impeaching the credibility of the nonparty witness with a prior…

Solomon v. Meyer

Plaintiffs' objections to certain evidentiary rulings made by Supreme Court are to a large extent unpreserved…