From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARR v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 15, 1985
473 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1719.

July 24, 1985. Rehearing Denied August 15, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

J. Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of ninety-nine years for armed robbery with a deadly weapon and fifteen years for aggravated battery. The trial judge retained jurisdiction over one third of his sentences. Because appellant was sentenced pursuant to the guidelines under which parole is no longer available, we strike the retention of jurisdiction provision of the sentences. § 921.001(8), Fla. Stat. (1983); Morales v. State, 471 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Williams v. State, 470 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The judgment and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BARR v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 15, 1985
473 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

BARR v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:ARBA EARL BARR, A/K/A FLOYD BARTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 15, 1985

Citations

473 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Therefore, appellant's sentences as to counts IV, V and VI of the information are remanded for resentencing…

Kerr v. State

Accordingly, we strike the retention of jurisdiction provision of defendant's sentences. See Blackwelder v.…