From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barocas v. PMG Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1971
36 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

March 29, 1971


In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 24, 1970 and entered February 10, 1971, as, after denying respondents' motion to vacate an order appointing a receiver, directed a hearing to be held for a determination as to whether the making of the mortgage constituted criminal usury in violation of section 190.40 Penal of the Penal Law. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements. Although the point is not raised by the parties, a reference to hear and determine is appealable ( Davidson v. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875) and we find that the separate hearing herein ordered was a reference to hear and determine. Since the order appealed from denied the motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver, it was an improper exercise of discretion for Special Term to order a separate hearing on the issue of criminal usury, not to aid in the determination of the motion, but to obtain an advance determination, prior to the trial, of but one of the issues raised by the pleadings. — Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barocas v. PMG Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1971
36 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Barocas v. PMG Holding Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BAROCAS et al., as Executors of MORRIS BAROCAS, Deceased, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1971

Citations

36 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Bagdy v. Progresso Foods Corp.

214), directed that a hearing be held at Special Term, Part III-a, on the issue of whether defendant…