From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Duncan

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 15, 2011
331 S.W.3d 360 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED94781.

February 15, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Case Number: 09ABAC01292, Stanley D. Williams, Judge.

Frederick H. Schwetye, Union, MO, for appellant.

Justin E. Head, Union, MO, for respondent.

Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.


ORDER


Steve and Cindy Duncan, who appeared at trial pro se, appeal from the trial court's grant of the consolidated petitions for ejectment filed by Richard and Barbara Barnett and Orville and Rosalee Garland against the Duncans. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court's finding is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2010).


Summaries of

Barnett v. Duncan

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 15, 2011
331 S.W.3d 360 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Barnett v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:Richard and Barbara BARNETT, et al., Respondents, v. Steve and Cindy…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

331 S.W.3d 360 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

In re Cunningham

Moreover, the Supreme Court of this state held, in construing section 32, article 2, of the Constitution of…

Dorn v. Stidham

Under the Constitution of 1868, only the articles of personal property therein enumerated could be exempted,…