From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnet v. Horwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1951
278 App. Div. 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

March 12, 1951.


In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order of the County Court, Westchester County, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The counterclaim on its face does not set forth a cause of action and in any event no factual showing is made which would indicate that a triable issue exists. There is no dispute that plaintiff has earned his commission as a broker in the amount set forth in the complaint. The affidavit in opposition is made by an attorney who does not reveal personal knowledge of the facts. It is without probative value. ( City Sav. Bank of Brooklyn v. Torro, 253 App. Div. 748, 749; Favole v. Gallo, 263 App. Div. 729.) Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barnet v. Horwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1951
278 App. Div. 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Barnet v. Horwitz

Case Details

Full title:STUART BARNET, Doing Business under the Name of NATIONAL REALTY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Varone v. Calarco

Defendant's burden cannot be met simply by a general denial and an affidavit of an attorney not personally…

Yancy v. Gambee

( Dodwell Co. v. Silverman, 234 App. Div. 362.) An opposing affidavit by an attorney without personal…