From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 13, 1995
658 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-00056.

January 13, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Randall G. McDonald, J.

Stephen M. Martin, Lakeland, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the judgment and sentences in all respects, but strike the imposition of the "cost/fine" in the amount of $33 because it was not announced at sentencing and there is no statutory authority given for the assessment of such a cost. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law expressed in Sutton.

Affirmed as modified and remanded with directions.

RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barnes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 13, 1995
658 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Barnes v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE BARNES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 13, 1995

Citations

658 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. State

An additional cost/fine of $33.00 must also be stricken because it was not announced at sentencing and the…

Hunter v. State

We also strike the $33 "cost/fine" imposed without citation to statutory authority. Barnes v. State, 658…