From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barkley v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jan 24, 2020
288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Summary

affirming revocation; remanding for entry of proper order

Summary of this case from Maldonado v. State

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-2141

01-24-2020

Quentin BARKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Quentin Barkley appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after the trial court found he violated his probation. We affirm but, as the State properly concedes, "remand solely for entry of a proper order revoking probation." Mitchell v. State, 263 So. 3d 252, 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of revocation order.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barkley v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jan 24, 2020
288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

affirming revocation; remanding for entry of proper order

Summary of this case from Maldonado v. State
Case details for

Barkley v. State

Case Details

Full title:QUENTIN BARKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

Citations

288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Maldonado v. State

We affirm the finding of violation but must remand because the trial court did not specify in its written…

Maldonado v. State

We affirm the finding of violation but must remand because the trial court did not specify in its written…