From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Norris

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 28, 2013
Civil Action No.: 5:12-374-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 5:12-374-MGL

02-28-2013

Monte Myiharell Barker, Plaintiff, v. Joey Norris, Joyce W. Brunson, Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

Plaintiff Monte Myiharell Barker is an inmate in custody at the Florence County Detention Center in Effingham, South Carolina. On February 9, 2012, Plaintiff proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 D.S.C., this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kaymani D. West for pretrial handling.

On December 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed a "Motion to Dismiss" because he was unable to obtain the "proper proof" to challenge the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 58.) The Defendants did not file a response to the motion. Thus, Magistrate Judge West recommended that Plaintiff's motion be granted and this action be dismissed without prejudice. (ECF No. 59.)

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. Id. The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made. Neither party filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

After a careful review of the record, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation, the court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to be proper. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Mary G. Lewis

United States District Judge
Spartanburg, South Carolina
February 28, 2013


Summaries of

Barker v. Norris

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 28, 2013
Civil Action No.: 5:12-374-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Barker v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:Monte Myiharell Barker, Plaintiff, v. Joey Norris, Joyce W. Brunson…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No.: 5:12-374-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2013)