From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bardwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 28, 1993
617 So. 2d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2362.

April 28, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Joe Wild, Acting C.J.

Kendall J. Phillips of Phillips Gale, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the conviction of appellant but reverse the sentence because of the trial court's failure to follow the mandatory provisions of section 775.084(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), which require the trial court to obtain a presentence investigation prior to sentencing a defendant as an habitual felony offender. While the defendant can knowingly waive the requirement of a P.S.I., see Likely v. State, 583 So.2d 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the record in this case does not reveal such a waiver.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bardwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 28, 1993
617 So. 2d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Bardwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIM BARDWELL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 28, 1993

Citations

617 So. 2d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. State

Id. at 530. Bardwell v. State, 617 So.2d 431 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), a direct appeal from a conviction and…

Moore v. State

Had the issue been preserved for review by a contemporaneous objection or rule 3.800(b) motion, it could have…