From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bardazzi v. Smook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1993
189 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 21, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart C. Cohen, J.).


The trial court did not abuse its discretion in requiring plaintiffs to pay each defendant costs of $1,200. The amendment of the complaint to include the cause of action for lack of informed consent was permitted about 10 years after the cause of action arose and after all previous discovery had been completed. Since that cause of action had not been discussed specifically during discovery, defendants should be reimbursed for any further discovery required on the matter. $1,200 is not excessive in light of amounts previously imposed by this Court (see, for example, Penick Co. v. Blue Comet Express, 81 A.D.2d 505, wherein permission to interpose an affirmative defense after only an 18-month delay was conditioned upon payment of costs of $1,000). Moreover, since each defendant has been represented separately by counsel in this matter, it was appropriate to require that each be paid $1,200.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Bardazzi v. Smook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1993
189 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Bardazzi v. Smook

Case Details

Full title:JUDY BARDAZZI et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD SMOOK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
592 N.Y.S.2d 382

Citing Cases

Beach v. Touradji Capital Management, LP

Plaintiffs were not prejudiced by the amendment of the counterclaims (see e.g. Valdes v. Marbrose Realty, 289…

Beach v. Touradji Capital Mgmt., LP

Plaintiffs were not prejudiced by the amendment of the counterclaims (see e.g. Valdes v Marbrose Realty, 289…