From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barclay v. Etim

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 23, 2015
129 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-06-23

H. Patrick BARCLAY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Odell H. ETIM, et al., Defendants–Respondents.


H. Patrick Barclay, appellant pro se.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling–Cohan, J.), entered December 3, 2013, which denied plaintiff's motion to vacate the dismissal of the action for failure to appear at a scheduled conference, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to vacate his default in this action alleging fraud and seeking to recover ownership of a parcel of real property. Plaintiff failed to submit with his moving papers an affidavit from someone with personal knowledge that addresses the merit of his claims ( see Biton v. Turco, 88 A.D.3d 519, 930 N.Y.S.2d 876 [1st Dept.2011]; Bollino v. Hitzig, 34 A.D.3d 711, 825 N.Y.S.2d 511 [2d Dept.2006] ).

TOM, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barclay v. Etim

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 23, 2015
129 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Barclay v. Etim

Case Details

Full title:H. Patrick BARCLAY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Odell H. ETIM, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5411
10 N.Y.S.3d 440