Opinion
March 16, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The affirmation of the plaintiff's attorney, who had no personal knowledge of the facts asserted therein, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to the plaintiff's claimed easement over the respondents' property (see, e.g., Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; Pastore v. Zlatniski, 112 A.D.2d 840). Bracken, J.P., Rubin, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.