From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber-Woodley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2014
Case No. 13-14502 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2014)

Summary

adopting Report & Recommendation (Grand, M.J.)

Summary of this case from Lozada-Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 13-14502

12-10-2014

ANITA BARBER-WOODLEY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 15) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 14) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 10) AND DISMISSING CASE

I.

This is a social security case. Plaintiff Anita Barber-Woodley appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment. See Docs. 10, 14.

On November 12, 2014, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that the Commissioner's motion be granted, that plaintiff's motion be denied, and the case be dismissed. (Doc. 15).

II.

Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendations.

Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: December 10, 2014

Detroit, Michigan
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, December 10, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Sakne Chami

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160


Summaries of

Barber-Woodley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2014
Case No. 13-14502 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2014)

adopting Report & Recommendation (Grand, M.J.)

Summary of this case from Lozada-Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Barber-Woodley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:ANITA BARBER-WOODLEY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-14502 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Lozada-Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

A mere week after Mr. Doud filed his brief on Plaintiff's behalf, Chief Judge Rosen issued an opinion warning…