From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 14, 1968
164 S.E.2d 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

43556.

SUBMITTED APRIL 1, 1968.

DECIDED OCTOBER 14, 1968.

Appellate procedure. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Holt.

William G. McRae, for appellant.

Long, Weinberg Ansley, Palmer Ansley, John K. Dunlap, for appellee.


"An order denying summary judgment is not subject to review by direct appeal or otherwise, unless within 10 days of the order of denial the trial judge certifies that the order denying summary judgment as to any issue or as to any party should be subject to review, in which case such order shall be subject to review by direct appeal." Code Ann. § 81A-156 (h) (Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 238). Certification is not automatic or a matter of right but is a matter of discretion with the trial judge. As pointed out in C A Land Co. v. Wilson Constr. Corp., 117 Ga. App. 744 ( 161 S.E.2d 922), it should be made use of sparingly in close cases where real doubt exists as to the merits of the motion, otherwise it will only become a vehicle for delaying trials on their merits.

There being no certification of the order, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Davis v. Holt, 224 Ga. 55 ( 159 S.E.2d 403).

Appeal dismissed. Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

SUBMITTED APRIL 1, 1968 — DECIDED OCTOBER 14, 1968.


Summaries of

Barber v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 14, 1968
164 S.E.2d 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Barber v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:BARBER v. BAKER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 14, 1968

Citations

164 S.E.2d 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
164 S.E.2d 349

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Mitchell Motors

The enumeration of error in relation to the denial of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, accordingly,…