From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARBARIAN RUGBY WEAR, INC. v. PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2008
06 Civ. 2652 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2008)

Opinion

06 Civ. 2652 (JGK).

December 8, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Freeman dated November 18, 2008 recommending that the Court deny PRL's motion to enforce the purported settlement agreement (Docket No. 84). The time for objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. In any event, the Report and Recommendation are well-founded and the Court adopts it.

Therefore, PRL's motion (Docket No. 84) is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BARBARIAN RUGBY WEAR, INC. v. PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2008
06 Civ. 2652 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2008)
Case details for

BARBARIAN RUGBY WEAR, INC. v. PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC.

Case Details

Full title:BARBARIAN RUGBY WEAR, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2008

Citations

06 Civ. 2652 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Trademark Prop. v. a E Television Network

Defendant makes much of the following text from an unpublished decision, suggesting it represents a unique…

Spheyr, Inc. v. Brooklyn Minds Psychiatry P.C.

Ie Court need not resolve the question, however, because “[t]he principles of New York law and federal common…