From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Pivnichny

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 20, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv487-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv487-MHT (WO)

11-20-2017

FREDERICK BANKS, an American Indian, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 3) is adopted.

(2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 20th day of November, 2017.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Banks v. Pivnichny

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 20, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv487-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Banks v. Pivnichny

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, an American Indian, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, et…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 20, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv487-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2017)