From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. McIntosh Cnty.

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Jun 15, 2022
Civil Action 2:16-cv-53 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:16-cv-53

06-15-2022

CAROLYN BANKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA, Defendant.


ORDER

BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Audrey Grovner's (“Ms. Grovner”) Consent Motion for Substitution of Plaintiff Rall Grovner. Doc. 458. Ms. Grovner states her husband, Plaintiff Rall Grovner, passed away on September 2, 2021, and she is the executrix of Plaintiff Grovner's estate. Id. at 1. Ms. Grovner moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) to substitute herself for Rall Grovner as a named Plaintiff in the above-captioned case. Ms. Grovner represents the County does not oppose her Motion.

Upon due consideration and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Ms. Grovner's Motion. “Audrey Grovner, as Executrix of the Estate of Rall Grovner” is hereby SUBSTITUTED for Plaintiff Rall Grovner, and the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to amend the record and docket of this case to reflect this substitution.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Banks v. McIntosh Cnty.

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Jun 15, 2022
Civil Action 2:16-cv-53 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Banks v. McIntosh Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN BANKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:16-cv-53 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 15, 2022)