From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Bank of Va. v. Carr

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1897
121 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1897)

Opinion

(September Term, 1897.)

Action on Note — Parties — Liability of Indorsers.

The owner of a note indorsed by the payees for the accommodation of the maker may sue any one of several indorsers without joining the maker or any other indorser.

ACTION tried before Timberlake, J., at June (Special) Term, 1897, of DURHAM.

The facts appear in the opinion. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.

Winston Fuller for plaintiff.

Guthrie Guthrie for defendant.


C. G. Holland made his promissory note payable to J. S. Carr and John W. Holland, and said payees indorsed said note for the accommodation of C. G. Holland, and in the regular course of business said note became the property of the plaintiff, who brings this action against J. S. Carr alone. The defendant insisted that the administrator of C. G. Holland, and John W. Holland, and one Green, to whom C. G. Holland had conveyed some property in trust to indemnify said John W. Holland against loss by reason of said indorsement, (114) should be made parties defendant before the plaintiff could recover against him, the present defendant. The defendant's counsel failed to cite any authority in support of his contention, and we are not aware of any.

A note signed by the principal and sureties is a joint and several obligation to pay money, and the owner may sue all or either of the obligors, and indorsers may be sued likewise. Code, secs. 41 and 50. We see no error in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Cited: Trust Co. v. Carr, post, next case; Bank v. Carr, 130 N.C. 480.


Summaries of

Nat'l Bank of Va. v. Carr

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1897
121 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1897)
Case details for

Nat'l Bank of Va. v. Carr

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL BANK OF VIRGINIA v. J. S. CARR

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1897

Citations

121 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1897)
28 S.E. 186

Citing Cases

Ray v. Livingston

In the former, the bank derived its title to the note from Shuford, the last endorser, and had the right at…

Castleberry v. Sasser

We cannot agree with this contention. W. A. Sasser, as the original plaintiff, was authorized to include all…