From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Garrett

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 2, 2016
144 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-02-2016

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., respondent, v. Jennifer GARRETT, appellant, et al., defendants.

Jennifer Garrett, Chester, NY, appellant pro se. Blank Rome LLP, New York, NY (Jill E. Alward and Timothy W. Salter of counsel), for respondent.


Jennifer Garrett, Chester, NY, appellant pro se.

Blank Rome LLP, New York, NY (Jill E. Alward and Timothy W. Salter of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Jennifer Garrett appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated October 2, 2013, which denied those branches of her motion which were for leave to reargue and renew her opposition to that branch of the plaintiff's prior motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further, ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants Jennifer Garrett and Marvin Bracey against their residential property located in Chester, New York.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of Garrett's motion which was for leave to renew her opposition to that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against her. A motion for leave to renew must be based, as is relevant here, on “new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221[e] ). Here, the new facts offered by Garrett would not have changed the prior determination.

The parties' remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Garrett

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 2, 2016
144 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:Bank of New York Mellon, etc., respondent, v. Jennifer Garrett, appellant…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
144 A.D.3d 621
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7155

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank v. Smart

Plaintiff has not set forth any reasonable justification for its failure to submit such information to…

Phx. Grantor Tr. v. Exclusive Hosp., LLC

Here, we agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the information set forth in the new affidavits…