From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of California v. Roberts

U.S.
Jan 27, 1919
248 U.S. 497 (1919)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 115.

Submitted December 19, 1918. Decided January 27, 1919.

Decided on authority of Bank of California v. Richardson, ante, p. 476. 173 Cal. 398, reversed.

Mr. E.S. Pillsbury, Mr. F.D. Madison, Mr. Alfred Sutro and Mr. Oscar Sutro for plaintiff in error. Mr. A.D. Plaw was also on the brief.

Mr. U.S. Webb, Attorney General of the State of California, and Mr. Raymond Benjamin, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of California, for defendant in error.


This case is controlled by the opinion in Bank of California v. Richardson, ante, p. 476. Indeed, it was submitted without briefs upon the briefs filed in that case. For the reasons stated in the previous case, therefore, the judgment here must be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Bank of California v. Roberts

U.S.
Jan 27, 1919
248 U.S. 497 (1919)
Case details for

Bank of California v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v . ROBERTS, TREASURER OF THE…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 27, 1919

Citations

248 U.S. 497 (1919)

Citing Cases

Tax Commission v. Balto. Nat. Bank

But this seems to be no more than the exemption applicable to federal agencies generally under the decision…

Baltimore Nat. Bank v. Tax Comm'n

By § 5219 of the Revised Statutes ( 12 U.S.C. § 548; cf. Act of June 3, 1864, 13 Stat. 99, 112; Act of…