From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bangle v. Bangle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
May 14, 2014
Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-240-O (N.D. Tex. May. 14, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-240-O

05-14-2014

KIMBERLY R. BANGLE, Plaintiff, v. GARY D. BANGLE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. Accordingly, Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of the Court. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

__________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bangle v. Bangle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
May 14, 2014
Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-240-O (N.D. Tex. May. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Bangle v. Bangle

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY R. BANGLE, Plaintiff, v. GARY D. BANGLE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: May 14, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-240-O (N.D. Tex. May. 14, 2014)

Citing Cases

Gwyn v. Kellas-Burton

, report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 19-751-JWD-EWD, 2020 WL 6276954 (M.D. La. Oct. 26, 2020) (“The…