From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

November, 1927.


The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff, with costs. We are constrained to hold that the publication of the notices of sale for the taxes levied in 1918 and 1919 was not in compliance with the statute applicable, and that, for such reason, the two deeds made by the county treasurer of Suffolk county to the defendant Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company, dated December 1, 1923, and January 31, 1924, are void and of no effect. ( Smith v. Butler, 215 App. Div. 361.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law contrary to this decision are reversed and new findings in accordance therewith will be made. Manning, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

See Tax Law, § 151, as amd. by Laws of 1918, chap. 159. ince amd. by several statutes. — [REP.


Summaries of

Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN BAMONTE, Appellant, v. OCEAN BEACH-FIRE ISLAND COMPANY, JOHN A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1927

Citations

222 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Olds v. City of Jamestown

The Legislature can, if it chooses, provide different periods of notice. The courts should not by meticulous…

Lindlots Realty Corp. v. County of Suffolk

In the present case the defect consisted of a failure to serve proper notice of sale, and it seems to be…