From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baltsavias v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1986
121 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 9, 1986

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Lengyel, J.).


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this case, the claimant asserts that the amount awarded to him by the Workers' Compensation Board for his injuries is inadequate. However, the claimant incorrectly brought this action in the Court of Claims. Pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 8, the State's waiver of immunity from liability does not affect any provision of the Workers' Compensation Law, and pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 23, the adequacy or inadequacy of the award is subject to review on direct appeal from the decision of the Workers' Compensation Board to the Appellate Division, Third Department. Hence, because the State has not waived its immunity for claims such as the one at bar, the Court of Claims correctly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Lazer, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baltsavias v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1986
121 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Baltsavias v. State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE BALTSAVIAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

McGuinness v. Workers Comp. Bd.

urt of Claims "is limited to actions seeking money damages against the State in appropriation, contract or…

Baltsavias v. State

The claimant has sought review in the Court of Claims of various determinations of the Workers' Compensation…