From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

U.S.
Dec 8, 1969
396 U.S. 114 (1969)

Summary

In Balthazar, a three-judge district court panel rejected a constitutional challenge to an Illinois tax sale process much like the Nebraska statutory system at issue in this case.

Summary of this case from Cont'l Res. v. Fair

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

No. 593.

Decided December 8, 1969

301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.

Marshall Patner for appellants.

Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.


The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


Summaries of

Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

U.S.
Dec 8, 1969
396 U.S. 114 (1969)

In Balthazar, a three-judge district court panel rejected a constitutional challenge to an Illinois tax sale process much like the Nebraska statutory system at issue in this case.

Summary of this case from Cont'l Res. v. Fair
Case details for

Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:BALTHAZAR ET UX. v . MARI LTD. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 8, 1969

Citations

396 U.S. 114 (1969)

Citing Cases

Coleman v. Dist. of Columbia

The Supreme Court summarily affirmed the judgment of the district court without elaboration. See Balthazar v.…

Wasiluk v. City of Oneida

Coleman, 70 F.Supp.3d at 79-80. The court is referring to Balthazar v. Mari Ltd., 396 U.S. 114, 90 S.Ct. 397,…