From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. Beckley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 17, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-1829 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:11-CV-1829

08-17-2012

DAWN MARIE BALL, Plaintiff v. BECKLEY, et al., Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)


(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint on May 11, 2012. (Doc. No. 54.) On July 13, 2012, Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that this Court dismiss all claims raised by Plaintiff with the exception of an excessive force claim raised against Defendants Beckley, Cooper, Smith, Curham, Kershner, and Famiglio. (Doc. No. 68.) The Court received Plaintiff's objections on July 18, 2012, and August 3, 2012. (Doc. No. 70, 72.) The objections fail to confront the legal findings in the Report and Recommendation in any meaningful way. Rather, the objections consist almost exclusively of complaints regarding prison staff and increasingly vituperative attacks on Judge Carlson. Upon a review of all the relevant documents the Court agrees with Judge Carlson that, with the exception of Plaintiff's excessive force claim, each of Plaintiff's claims is completely devoid of legal merit.

ACCORDINGLY, on this 17th day of August 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 68) is ADOPTED, the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 54) is GRANTED IN PART, and all claims with the exception of Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendants Beckley, Cooper, Smith, Curham, Kershner, and Famiglio are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendants Werner, Franz, Baldwin, Kile, Frey, Charles, and Wolfe from this action. This matter shall be referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for continued pre-trial management and resolution of dispositive motions.

___________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ball v. Beckley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 17, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-1829 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Ball v. Beckley

Case Details

Full title:DAWN MARIE BALL, Plaintiff v. BECKLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:11-CV-1829 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2012)

Citing Cases

Marinkovic v. Battaglia

Plaintiff has cited no persuasive law to support the claim in Count I, and the Court declines his invitation…