From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Zukor

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Feb 13, 2004
60 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)

Summary

finding "no merit to the defendant's contention that absent an allegation of privity the plaintiff failed to assert an actionable common law fraud theory"

Summary of this case from Mahoney v. Wells Fargo Bank

Opinion

No. 02-P-1701.

February 13, 2004.


Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28.

The judgment of dismissal is reversed and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court.


Summaries of

Baker v. Zukor

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Feb 13, 2004
60 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)

finding "no merit to the defendant's contention that absent an allegation of privity the plaintiff failed to assert an actionable common law fraud theory"

Summary of this case from Mahoney v. Wells Fargo Bank
Case details for

Baker v. Zukor

Case Details

Full title:GARY K. BAKER v. AMY B. ZUKOR

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Feb 13, 2004

Citations

60 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)

Citing Cases

Mahoney v. Wells Fargo Bank

The same principle applies to common law fraud or, by analogy, the similar intentional misrepresentation. See…