Baker v. Astrue

Full title: JUDITH BAKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Civil No. 07-6332-TC (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-6332-TC.

March 31, 2009

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 6, 2009. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.