From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 7, 1997
691 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-330

Opinion filed March 7, 1997

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Gayle S. Graziano, Judge.

Deviral Bain, Daytona Beach, Pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Deviral Bain is before us on his fourth Rule 3.850 motion. He has been consistently unsuccessful thus far and his luck has not changed. We affirm the trial court's denial of his latest effort.

He claims "newly discovered" evidence that the State withheld impeachment evidence from the defense. He contends that this evidence is contained in an internal investigation file involving Officer Williams, who testified against him at trial. The problem with Bain's current position is that the evidence is neither newly discovered nor is it admissible evidence. The information contained in the internal investigation file which is relied on by Bain, with due diligence, should have been discovered earlier. More damaging, however, is the fact that the claimed new evidence would have been inadmissible in any event. See Jackson v. State, 545 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1989) (evidence of police officer's department reprimands inadmissible as impeachment evidence as it concerned inadmissible general acts of misconduct; reprimand not a conviction). AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 7, 1997
691 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Bain v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEVIRAL BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 7, 1997

Citations

691 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

LaMore v. State

In considering the second prong, the trial court should initially consider whether the evidence would have…

Jones v. State

See Johnson v. Singletary, 647 So.2d 106, 110-11 (Fla. 1994);cf. Bain v. State, 691 So.2d 508, 509 (Fla. 5th…