From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 28, 2009
281 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED90874.

April 28, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.

Maleaner R. Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Prior report: 190 S.W.3d 562.



ORDER


Movant, James Bailey, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not allowing him to testify at trial.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bailey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 28, 2009
281 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Bailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:James E. BAILEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Apr 28, 2009

Citations

281 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Steele

On April 28, 2009, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court. Bailey v. State,…