From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baggett v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 10, 2012
5:11-CV-0195 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2012)

Opinion

5:11-CV-0195

07-10-2012

BESSIE BAGGETT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

APPEARANCES: OLINSKY LAW GROUP Counsel for Plaintiff HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN United States Attorney OF COUNSEL: KAREN S. SOUTHWICK, ESQ. BENIL ABRAHAM, ESQ. Special Assistant U.S. Attorney


APPEARANCES:

OLINSKY LAW GROUP

Counsel for Plaintiff

HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN

United States Attorney

OF COUNSEL:

KAREN S. SOUTHWICK, ESQ.

BENIL ABRAHAM, ESQ.

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

NORMAN A. MORDUE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed on the 13th day of June 2012. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the Commissioner's determination is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further consideration.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 10, 2012

Syracuse, New York

________________

Honorable Norman A. Mordue

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Baggett v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 10, 2012
5:11-CV-0195 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Baggett v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BESSIE BAGGETT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 10, 2012

Citations

5:11-CV-0195 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Surrusco v. Berryhill

Under this provision, a court may "remand the matter to the agency in order to allow gaps in the evidentiary…

Quinlan v. Berryhill

Under this provision, a court may "remand the matter to the agency in order to allow gaps in the evidentiary…