From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 1994
201 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 24, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


Since plaintiff corporation was dissolved, the trial court properly concluded that since plaintiff, as a delinquent corporation, had not sought reinstatement by paying back taxes and penalties, it had no legal capacity to commence this action (Lorisa Capital Corp. v. Gallo, 119 A.D.2d 99, 110). In passing, we note that plaintiff's contention that the landlord obtained possession of the premises in violation of RPAPL 853 was not raised below and is without merit.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 1994
201 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng

Case Details

Full title:B O REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. CHONG-YAU JENG et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 776

Citing Cases

The Cloister E. v. The N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

The record in this case established that petitioner Cloister East was a corporation dissolved by…

Simmons v. Rich Kid Entm't 1, Rich Kid Music, Inc.

A dissolved corporation, such as Boomer X, has no existence, either de jure or de facto, except for a limited…