From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Azubuko v. Hartz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 6, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-0396 (UNA) (D.D.C. Mar. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 20-0396 (UNA)

03-06-2020

CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS L. HARTZ, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

In 2005, the plaintiff filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma against the State of New Hampshire. See Compl. at 1. The court dismissed the case as frivolous. see Azubuko v. New Hampshire, No. 5:05-cv-0176-C (W.D. Okla. Feb. 23, 2005). With respect to the plaintiff's appeal of a post-judgment motion, the court denied plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the ground that the appeal was not taken in good faith. See Azubuko v. New Hampshire, No. 5:05-cv-0176-C (W.D. Okla. June 9, 2005). This matter has come before the Court on review of the plaintiff's pro se complaint, which asks this Court to vacate the Oklahoma district court's rulings and enter judgment in the plaintiff's favor. Compl. at 5.

As a general rule applicable here, a federal district court lacks jurisdiction to review the decisions of other courts. See e.g., Petrovic v. United States, No. 1:19-CV-00482, 2019 WL 1746301, at *2 (D.D.C. Apr. 17, 2019), appeal dismissed, No. 19-5129, 2019 WL 5692686 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 6, 2019), and appeal dismissed, No. 19-5139, 2019 WL 5963409 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 6, 2019); United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79, 85 (D.D.C. 2011) (citing Lewis v. Green, 629 F. Supp. 546, 553 (D.D.C. 1986)); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994) (applying District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983), and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923) ), aff'd, No. 94-5079, 1994 WL 474995 (D.C. Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1150 (1995).

Because this Court lacks jurisdiction and cannot grant the relief the plaintiff seeks, the complaint and this civil action will be dismissed. The Court also will grant the plaintiff Azubuko's application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss Okereke as a party plaintiff. An Order consistent is issued separately. DATE: March 6, 2020

/s/

TREVOR N. McFADDEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Azubuko v. Hartz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 6, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-0396 (UNA) (D.D.C. Mar. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Azubuko v. Hartz

Case Details

Full title:CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS L. HARTZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 20-0396 (UNA) (D.D.C. Mar. 6, 2020)